How did the household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates) change in Canada?
The answer
Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates) increased in Canada.
- Overall change
- +2.78 Ratio
- 23.2% increase
- Start · 1996 Q2
- 11.97 Ratio
- Latest · 2026 Q1
- 14.75 Ratio
What this answer shows
- Measure
- Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates)
- Area shown
- Canada
- Period
- 1996 Q2–2026 Q1Quarterly
- Unit
- Ratio
Selected details
- Seasonal adjustment
- Seasonally adjusted at annual rates
- Estimates
- Debt service ratio
- Payment coverage
- Required mortgage and non-mortgage principal and interest
- Income denominator
- Household disposable income before interest payments
- Geographic coverage
- Canada only
Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates) rose from 11.97 Ratio to 14.75 Ratio between 1996 Q2 and 2026 Q1—an increase of 2.78 Ratio, or 23.2%. It reached an observed high of 15.17 Ratio in 2023 Q1 before ending at 14.75 Ratio in 2026 Q1.
Evidence prepared Revision c9882d908d7bView data updates
Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates) in Canada
Quarterly · 120 observations · 1996 Q2–2026 Q1
- Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates)14.75 Ratio
Hover or tap the chart, or use the slider. Left and right arrow keys move one period at a time.
The vertical scale is focused on the observed values and does not start at zero.
- Observed high
- 15.17 Ratio2023 Q1
- Observed low
- 11.71 Ratio2002 Q1
Exact values120 observations · 1996 Q2–2026 Q1
| Period | Household debt service ratio (seasonally adjusted at annual rates) |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1Latest | 14.75 Ratio |
| 2025 Q4 | 14.68 Ratio |
| 2025 Q3 | 14.71 Ratio |
| 2025 Q2 | 14.78 Ratio |
| 2025 Q1 | 14.68 Ratio |
| 2024 Q4 | 14.67 Ratio |
| 2024 Q3 | 14.77 Ratio |
| 2024 Q2 | 15.09 Ratio |
| 2024 Q1 | 15.1 Ratio |
| 2023 Q4 | 15.13 Ratio |
| 2023 Q3 | 15.09 Ratio |
| 2023 Q2 | 15.14 Ratio |
| 2023 Q1 | 15.17 Ratio |
| 2022 Q4 | 14.62 Ratio |
| 2022 Q3 | 14.43 Ratio |
| 2022 Q2 | 14 Ratio |
| 2022 Q1 | 13.81 Ratio |
| 2021 Q4 | 13.9 Ratio |
| 2021 Q3 | 13.68 Ratio |
| 2021 Q2 | 13.72 Ratio |
| 2021 Q1 | 13.57 Ratio |
| 2020 Q4 | 13.94 Ratio |
| 2020 Q3 | 13.47 Ratio |
| 2020 Q2 | 12.56 Ratio |
| 2020 Q1 | 14.64 Ratio |
| 2019 Q4 | 14.95 Ratio |
| 2019 Q3 | 15.06 Ratio |
| 2019 Q2 | 15.03 Ratio |
| 2019 Q1 | 15.11 Ratio |
| 2018 Q4 | 14.94 Ratio |
| 2018 Q3 | 14.97 Ratio |
| 2018 Q2 | 14.85 Ratio |
| 2018 Q1 | 14.64 Ratio |
| 2017 Q4 | 14.38 Ratio |
| 2017 Q3 | 14.25 Ratio |
| 2017 Q2 | 14.3 Ratio |
| 2017 Q1 | 14.31 Ratio |
| 2016 Q4 | 14.12 Ratio |
| 2016 Q3 | 14.15 Ratio |
| 2016 Q2 | 14.18 Ratio |
| 2016 Q1 | 14.17 Ratio |
| 2015 Q4 | 13.81 Ratio |
| 2015 Q3 | 13.81 Ratio |
| 2015 Q2 | 13.9 Ratio |
| 2015 Q1 | 13.98 Ratio |
| 2014 Q4 | 14.1 Ratio |
| 2014 Q3 | 13.91 Ratio |
| 2014 Q2 | 13.88 Ratio |
| 2014 Q1 | 13.84 Ratio |
| 2013 Q4 | 13.83 Ratio |
| 2013 Q3 | 13.87 Ratio |
| 2013 Q2 | 13.83 Ratio |
| 2013 Q1 | 13.77 Ratio |
| 2012 Q4 | 13.97 Ratio |
| 2012 Q3 | 13.98 Ratio |
| 2012 Q2 | 14.02 Ratio |
| 2012 Q1 | 13.95 Ratio |
| 2011 Q4 | 14.02 Ratio |
| 2011 Q3 | 14.14 Ratio |
| 2011 Q2 | 14.18 Ratio |
| 2011 Q1 | 14.09 Ratio |
| 2010 Q4 | 14.04 Ratio |
| 2010 Q3 | 14.1 Ratio |
| 2010 Q2 | 14.11 Ratio |
| 2010 Q1 | 13.76 Ratio |
| 2009 Q4 | 13.82 Ratio |
| 2009 Q3 | 13.87 Ratio |
| 2009 Q2 | 14.09 Ratio |
| 2009 Q1 | 14.19 Ratio |
| 2008 Q4 | 14.37 Ratio |
| 2008 Q3 | 14.5 Ratio |
| 2008 Q2 | 14.66 Ratio |
| 2008 Q1 | 14.82 Ratio |
| 2007 Q4 | 15 Ratio |
| 2007 Q3 | 14.88 Ratio |
| 2007 Q2 | 14.54 Ratio |
| 2007 Q1 | 14.16 Ratio |
| 2006 Q4 | 14.04 Ratio |
| 2006 Q3 | 13.96 Ratio |
| 2006 Q2 | 13.91 Ratio |
| 2006 Q1 | 13.46 Ratio |
| 2005 Q4 | 13.49 Ratio |
| 2005 Q3 | 13.28 Ratio |
| 2005 Q2 | 13.15 Ratio |
| 2005 Q1 | 13.11 Ratio |
| 2004 Q4 | 12.67 Ratio |
| 2004 Q3 | 12.42 Ratio |
| 2004 Q2 | 12.36 Ratio |
| 2004 Q1 | 12.47 Ratio |
| 2003 Q4 | 12.49 Ratio |
| 2003 Q3 | 12.46 Ratio |
| 2003 Q2 | 12.34 Ratio |
| 2003 Q1 | 12.04 Ratio |
| 2002 Q4 | 11.99 Ratio |
| 2002 Q3 | 11.88 Ratio |
| 2002 Q2 | 11.81 Ratio |
| 2002 Q1 | 11.71 Ratio |
| 2001 Q4 | 11.81 Ratio |
| 2001 Q3 | 11.99 Ratio |
| 2001 Q2 | 12.28 Ratio |
| 2001 Q1 | 12.05 Ratio |
| 2000 Q4 | 12.36 Ratio |
| 2000 Q3 | 12.32 Ratio |
| 2000 Q2 | 12.35 Ratio |
| 2000 Q1 | 12.21 Ratio |
| 1999 Q4 | 12.15 Ratio |
| 1999 Q3 | 12.04 Ratio |
| 1999 Q2 | 12.05 Ratio |
| 1999 Q1 | 12.26 Ratio |
| 1998 Q4 | 12.33 Ratio |
| 1998 Q3 | 12.38 Ratio |
| 1998 Q2 | 12.33 Ratio |
| 1998 Q1 | 12.22 Ratio |
| 1997 Q4 | 11.92 Ratio |
| 1997 Q3 | 11.78 Ratio |
| 1997 Q2 | 11.94 Ratio |
| 1997 Q1 | 11.9 Ratio |
| 1996 Q4 | 11.9 Ratio |
| 1996 Q3 | 12.03 Ratio |
| 1996 Q2 | 11.97 Ratio |
About this data
How to read this measureRequired debt payments are divided by household disposable income with interest payments added back. This is an aggregate household-sector ratio, not the average burden among borrowers or the amount of debt outstanding. The source reports a ratio on a percentage scale: 14.75 represents 14.75% of income.
Data shown through 2026 Q1Table updated
These are the selections used for this answer. The full Statistics Canada table (opens in a new tab) (11-10-0065-01) contains other measures and breakdowns.
Adapted from Statistics Canada, Debt service indicators of households, national balance sheet accounts, 2026-06-12. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.
How this answer was calculatedThe headline compares the first and last observations shown. Absolute change is the last source value minus the first; relative change is (last ÷ first − 1) × 100. Intermediate observations remain visible in the chart and exact values. This is descriptive and does not identify causes.